Search for: "Lee On v. Long"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 8:41 pm
If you actually read these patents you will notice that the Background of the Invention is rather long (nearly 4 full columns) and in a post KSR v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
As of now, the 1969 Supreme Court decision of Tinker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
Hyder v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
It's pretty long and that is only one of several reasons to approach it cautiously. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
Lee v United Kingdom [2022] ECHR Application no. 18860/19: The Supreme Court had upheld the refusal of Ashers Baking, on religious/moral grounds, to supply a cake to Mr Lee decorated with a colour picture of the Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie with the caption, “Support Gay Marriage”, and he challenged that decision at Strasbourg, on the grounds that it violated his Convention rights under Articles 8, 9, 10 and 14. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Florida and Atkins v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
The other big news from State Farm v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:27 am
Representative of the links received is this one from long-term blog-reader Lee Curtis (katpat!) [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:31 am
However, in the Madey v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 3:13 pm
If the Supreme Court did not so conclude in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:43 am
The Court’s decision in Global Military Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Lee (Kenyon & Kenyon) noted that both brand-name pharmaceutical companies and generics want reverse payments to continue. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:57 am
Mike Lee (R-Utah), proposes to streamline the approval process for biosimilar drugs by automatically deeming all FDA-approved biosimilars as interchangeable with their reference products. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
Lee, 474 S.W.3d 435, 442 (Tex. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Jane noted that the plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
See, e.g., Imbler v. [read post]
