Search for: "Lilly v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Supreme Court* Federal Appellate Court Decisions* State Roundup* Topical* Articles/Reports/Books* Foreign SpotlightTo begin, scan the link descriptions below and click.U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 3:12 pm
On January 22, 2009, the United States Senate voted to pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
 In May 2007, the Court ruled in Ledbetter v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:53 pm
Senate -- after hours of debate on various amendments this afternoon -- passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 by a vote of 61-36. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
Congress finds the following: (1) The Supreme Court in Ledbetter v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:55 pm
Supreme Court decisions that have barred these lawsuits against state governments; and (8) Overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board & Care Home v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:55 pm
The other bill entitled the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 would overturn a 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court, which enforced a strict 180-day deadline for filing suit in an equal pay case, which caused Lilly Ledbetter's case against Goodyear Tire Company to be dismissed. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
  The Ledbetter  Act is named after a losing plaintiff in an oft-criticized Supreme Court case, Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 3:16 am
  (That is, provided of course, that the Court doesn’t rule in Hulteen’s favor based on the current state of the law.) - David S. [read post]