Search for: "Los Angeles v. David" Results 781 - 800 of 1,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am by Conor McEvily
  Lyle provides coverage of the request here as do the Associated Press, Reuters, and the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:30 pm by Frank Pasquale
Los Angeles has not only avoided arrests, but seems to be expanding available public space as the protest swells. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
  MSNBC, the New York Times, McClatchy, the Huffington Post, and the Los Angeles Times all have coverage of the ACA’s path to the Court and the constitutional issues at stake. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
There were a number of other interesting legal discussions published by the Guardian: media law consultant David Banks asked how stringently should contempt laws be applied to new media. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
From the days of Fenton and Conkling, and Arthur and Cornell, and Platt, from the days of David B. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
A decision in this case is expected by the end of the current Supreme Court term.David Axelrad is an attorney with Horvitz & Levy in Los Angeles. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:50 am
A decision in this case is expected by the end of the current Supreme Court term.David Axelrad is an attorney with Horvitz & Levy in Los Angeles. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Goldberg reacts to M.B.Z. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
  The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, Slate, Education Week, and Reuters also provide coverage. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times and NPR’s Nina Totenberg preview today’s oral argument in the M.B.Z. case, in which the Court will consider the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress in the context of the Middle East peace process. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
  In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that the Court “showed little enthusiasm . . . for reopening the cases of criminal defendants who lost out on good plea deals based on bad advice or bungling by their lawyers,” an observation echoed by Mike Sacks at the Huffington Post and Robert Barnes at the Washington Post. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:38 am by David Lat
In the lawsuit, covered last week by Casey Sullivan over at the Los Angeles Daily Journal (subscription), Tamman claims that he was “thrown under the bus” by Nixon Peabody and his former partners at the firm. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
  And in the Los Angeles Times, David Savage previews next week’s argument in National Meat Association v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Conor McEvily
  Tom Ramstack of All Headline News has coverage, as does David Savage of the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
Supreme Court (5th ed., 2010) edited by David Savage of the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Nabiha Syed
  Greg Stohr of Bloomberg has coverage of the grant, as do Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Bill Mears of CNN, James Vicini of Reuters, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, David Kravets of Wired, Ariane de Vogue of ABC News, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Michael Doyle of McClatchy, and Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Kiran Bhat
David Kravets at Wired Magazine’s Threat Level blog characterizes the denial of certiorari in Vernor v. [read post]