Search for: "Low v. Low"
Results 781 - 800
of 15,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
The amicus brief concludes that the 5th Circuit panel wrongly upheld the statute by incorrectly interpreting the same court’s May 2022 ruling in Jarkesy v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
In fact, analysis of historical data from 1946-2022, cross-referenced with regime-type data from V-Dem, reveals that a successful coup has never occurred in a liberal democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
See Fortune v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:34 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:28 pm
Diminishing the ability of voters to amend their constitutions through statewide ballot initiatives following the Supreme Court’s overturn of Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
[1] Sackett v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:47 am
Meads v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
” Sanders v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:30 pm
Minnesota - In Hart v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Ira was a big proponent of keeping the overhead low. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:10 am
(“SFFA”) v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
After explaining the general principles of FRAND the Judge in Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) calculated what the FRAND rates should be for Lenovo. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:03 am
V. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
From Trump v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
In many cases, the sufficiency bar is low and can be satisfied by providing a single example falling in the scope of the claim in the application as filed.However, for certain types of invention there may be a higher level of underlying doubt about whether the invention can be worked by a skilled person. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 5:08 am
As the CJEU held in BMS v. [read post]
