Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 781 - 800
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 4:31 am
The Court: The good Lord may know you didn't do it, but he didn't speak to the folks on the jury, I'm afraid. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:41 am
” DeBoer v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
All that has changed is the removal of the stay and M’s admission to the school. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 11:13 am
Collins J cites Lord Woolf in M v Home Office [1994] 1 A.C. 377 While contempt proceedings … against a government department or a minister in an official capacity would not be either personal or punitive (it would clearly not be appropriate to fine or sequestrate the assets of the Crown or a government department or an officer of the Crown acting in his official capacity), this does not mean that a finding of contempt against… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
[v] This is money that otherwise would have gone to medical providers. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:24 am
I'm just trying to say that if you start there -- and, honestly, they should be read in order because Lord Peter ages in real time -- and feel a bit underwhelmed, know the series only gets better from there.) [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
They gave him a bathroom break in the middle (no, I'm not kidding). [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 5:18 am
Wasa v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:14 am
I can stand for him, and I’m going to…I’m a Christian and believe in this. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
Praise the lord and pass the ammunition. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Small in 1838, through Rylands and Fletcher, through M’ALISTER or DONOGHUE (Pauper) v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:49 am
"funny computer wallpaper for law student" - Law Lord pulling a mooner? [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Switching from con law to torts: Donoghue v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
There is some guidance as to the procedure to be adopted where the prosecuting authority seek an ASBO (see M v DPP [2007] EWHC 1032 (Admin)) but - so far as I’m aware - nothing to assist the trial Judge where she considers making an order of her own volition. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
I’m also surprised that it was not argued that possession pursuant to a notice to quit violates Art. 8, following McCann and Cosic. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:46 am
The only thing I can say [is] I did not do it and the good Lord in Heaven know I didn't.The Court: The good Lord may know you didn't do it, but he didn't speak to the folks on the jury, I'm afraid. [read post]
