Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 21,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2023, 3:23 am
Fraud: Nature's Sunshine alleged that Petitioner Thrive twice falsely stated that it was using its mark THRIVE on all of the goods in its registration, when it had used the mark only on some of the goods. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
Cheney v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Mark Meadows (1:23-cv-03621) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Clark): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:00 am
Offers of settlement should be referred to as offers of settlement, marked “without prejudice”, not contain an admission of liability, and invite the other party to engage in communications to settle a disputed claim. van der Westhuizen v Akarana Homeowners Association High Court Western Cape Division, case number 11867/2020 (delivered 22 August 2023) [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
—Bertrand Russell 1Lambert v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:43 pm
No other factor that we have explored has produced such a marked change in predicted likelihood. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
—Mark Twain 1DeAngelis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” State of Maryland v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am
Courts use that standard to determine whether an affidavit justifies a search or seizure because there is probable cause to believe that the subject committed a crime.In Illinois v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:09 am
In Amicus Therapeutics US, LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:09 am
In Amicus Therapeutics US, LLC v. [read post]
