Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 781 - 800
of 20,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 2:37 am
In D&B, the person "protected" was the one who benefitted from the original agreement - obviously, his circumstances changed.A competent lawyer will ensure you don't resolve these matters except in a way that you are protected. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:03 pm
Rather in the present case they arise in the context of the evaluation of A 83 when considering the question of whether or not the claimed subject-matter can be carried out over the whole scope without undue burden, they therefore have been dealt with there […]. [96] In conclusion the subject-matter of […] claim 1 […] and claims dependent thereon involves an inventive step. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
[b]ecause we believe that it’s important for us to celebrate our culture and to communicate to the world that Black money matters.... [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Does it matter that the TTAB got it wrong because you didn’t turn over every stone in the opposition proceeding to prevail? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
T 139/87; T 2140/09) the case ought therefore to have been rectified by the department of first instance pursuant to A 109(1). [read post]
27 May 2021, 3:49 am
[T]o read those words as allowing what they do not say, namely, as allowing the Commission to dispense with administrative proceedings to obtain monetary relief as well, is to read the words as going well beyond the provision’s subject matter,” Justice Breyer wrote. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:02 pm
Plus, for that matter, the wrong public voted - to match voice with consequences, young people and future generations should have counted for more here than they did in the actual balloting.But the reasons it seems likely to happen are (a) politicians in both of the major parties who know better are playing it safe or thinking small or treating it as "politics as usual," and (b) those with a large enough voice to do something individually, such as the U.K.'s… [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:52 pm
Claud & Douglas B. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
The letter of 23 October 2009 did not include a formal request to allow the accompanying person to make oral submissions and in any case the generally-worded statement of the respondent did not specify the subject-matter of the proposed oral submissions (G 4/95 [headnote points 2(b)(i) and (ii)]). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:04 am
Rule 4.2 in most states prohibits, without consent of opposing counsel, communications about a matter with a person represented by counsel in that matter. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
"The other provisions that you say allow disclosure aren't quite as clear to me. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
A 56[3.1] The subject-matter of claim 1 of the patent in suit relates to the (a) use of valaciclovir in the manufacture of a medicament (b) for oral administration (c) for the suppression of recurrent genital herpes in a human host (d) at a once daily dose (e) of 500 mg. [3.2] Document D5 represents the closest state of the art. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
At the moment we don't have even that. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Juror C then announced that `no matter what happens, my verdict is for guilty. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:32 am
Suite 104 Redlands, CA 92374 T: (909) 708-6055 E: michael@michaelreiterlaw.com W: http://michaelreiterlaw.com [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Novelty[3] Since it was not contested by the [patent proprietor] that the washing machine with model number WD-R100C constituting the established public prior use, as exemplified in Appendix B, comprises all features of claim 1 of the patent in suit and since the Board finds no reason to conclude otherwise, the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks novelty (A 54(1)) and the [patent proprietor’s] main request is therefore not allowable. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
[T]he method it uses to adjust claims is not independently actionable. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:22 am
The Board disagreed, and it dismissed the opposition without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
§ 9003 (b), formerly cited as 42 USC § 11603 (b). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am
However, examining divisions should make sure that an internet disclosure used as state of the art is reliable in terms of both the publication date (see decision T 1066/13, Reasons 4 to 4.3; see also the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, G-IV, 7.5.1) and continued accessibility to its content in the version made publicly accessible on that date (see decision T 3071/19, Reasons 5; see also T 0013/20, Reasons 4).9. [read post]
