Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 781 - 800 of 20,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing the decision in Matter of Marsteller, 217 AD3d 543, the Appellate Division said "(t)he affirmation of Eric J. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am by Sasha Volokh
  Provided the "too much" question is answered properly, why should it matter, under that doctrine, who gets that power? [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am by Lindsay A. Heller
(the husband), after (a) 30 years of marriage and (b) mutually dismissing a US divorce matter in 2017, which was filed in 2012. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Interpreting § 315(c) to allow joinder regardless of time limits renders § 315(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel Shaviro
But other players, such as borrowers (another class of customer) and employees, apparently don't gain anything. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am by Tom Joscelyn
§§ 16-4-8 and 16-10-20.1(b)(1), as well as the lead charge in the indictment that remains against 15 co-defendants, RICO Conspiracy, O.C.G.A. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:00 am by Sherica Celine
Read now » Related Content Client Intake Form (Federal) Use this client intake form meant for use with potential clients who come in for consultations about a new matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:57 pm by Elizabeth Strunk
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
However, they are admissible in Maryland under Maryland Rule of Evidence 803(b)(8)(A). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But demanding that people not criticize country A unless they can explain why they don't criticize countries B through Z (many of which most people haven't even heard of) is essentially a demand that they not criticize country A, period. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
So: no joy on acquiescence, because five years wouldn’t be up until 2024. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:59 am by Charles Geyh
  Finally, the new SCOTUS Code adds that “[t]he rule of necessity may override the rule of disqualification. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm by Russell Knight
Ct. 1996) “[I]t is seldom in a child’s interest to be asked to choose between his parents or to believe that his expression of preference will influence the judge’s decision. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
The Committee approved it by a recorded vote of 125 in favour to 48 against, with 9 abstentions (Armenia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Iceland, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Türkiye, United Arab Emirates). [read post]