Search for: "MATTER OF JAMES v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
State Dickinson School of Law. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:38 am
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:37 pm
The case is styled United States of America v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
”This article draws on two excellent books: James C. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Maybe, held the Third Department in its June 17, 2021 decision in Matter of John U. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Lastly, James v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The decision, written by the court’s presiding judge, James E. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:54 pm
Newman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am
What the Rich Don’t Want to Admit About the PoorBlack Lives Matter: So You Want to Learn About Juneteenth? [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as licensing Roberts v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
In the case of Ruffing v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 1:27 pm
James asks the court to clarify the difference between state taxes and other types of assessments, such as penalties or fees. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Matter of Noonan, 17 B.R. 793, 800 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
