Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 781 - 800
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 2:41 am
Children are inherently seen to be more vulnerable than adults, and as such the Secretary of State has “historically adopted different, more favourable policies in relation to asylum seekers who are under 18“. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am
State Department. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm
RB (Algeria)-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] 2 WLR 512 says not. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Subsection 1 states: (1) The land comprised in the site of the central garden of Parliament Square (which, at the passing of this Act, is vested in the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport) is by this subsection transferred to and vested in Her Majesty as part of the hereditary possessions and revenues of Her Majesty. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Subsection 1 states: (1) The land comprised in the site of the central garden of Parliament Square (which, at the passing of this Act, is vested in the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport) is by this subsection transferred to and vested in Her Majesty as part of the hereditary possessions and revenues of Her Majesty. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
Nor was it legitimate to promote the public law duty of the school, not giving rise to a private law action, to a duty under section 6 of the HRA remediable by a claim in damages (R (Holub) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 1359 at 1367). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
As far as its text is concerned, the President’s authority to remove the Commissioners is no different from his authority to remove the Secretary of State or the Attorney General. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:31 am
See Karaha Bodas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
The trade laws have three main features: specific tariff reductions and rate-setting; treaties and agreements for trade arrangements, including non-tariff barriers and intellectual property; global capital flows have led often to treatment of trade and investment together such that bilateral investment treaties have become a frequent subject of trade negotiations. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
The trade laws have three main features: specific tariff reductions and rate-setting; treaties and agreements for trade arrangements, including non-tariff barriers and intellectual property; global capital flows have led often to treatment of trade and investment together such that bilateral investment treaties have become a frequent subject of trade negotiations. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
Secretary of HUD, 54 F.3d 1560, 1567-68 (10th Cir. 1995). [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:30 am
But attempting similar arguments in respect of more established legal systems, such as the US, is much more difficult, as can be seen in another recent extradition case, Khan v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 1127 (Admin) (19 May 2010). [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Connors v Birmingham CC Birmingham County Court 15/01/2010 Ms C was owed the main housing duty by Birmingham. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Connors v Birmingham CC Birmingham County Court 15/01/2010 Ms C was owed the main housing duty by Birmingham. [read post]
