Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 781 - 800 of 9,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:05 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Contrary to Respondents’ suggestion, the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Michigan v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Redpath, and Owen Mark Williams Case number: 10-cv-03995 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: September 21, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 15, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-40 SEC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Paula Black
United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart must have felt equal frustration when trying to define “obscenity. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
But they also could mark the beginning of the Supreme Court’s strike against the administrative state. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Petitioner Mark Janus is a state employee whose unit is represented by a public-sector union (Union), one of the respondents. [read post]
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number: No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European… [read post]
Case date: 10 March 2021 Case number: No. 20-10785 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number:No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design… [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]