Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 781 - 800
of 6,943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Georgetown Law Professor Martin Lederman and I filed an amicus brief in California v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
Martin's blog post today here. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:12 pm
’s “I Have a Dream” speech, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
GoDaddy and Lockheed Martin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:07 am
Mzuri Limited (‘Mzuri’) and Christopher Martin Lole (sole director of Mzuri) were the defendants. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
Some history of the case The current law is established by two Upper Tribunal decisions: Goldsbrough v CA Property Management Limited [2019] UKUT 311 (LC) and Rakusen v Jepson [2020] UKUT 298 (LC). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
Some history of the case The current law is established by two Upper Tribunal decisions: Goldsbrough v CA Property Management Limited [2019] UKUT 311 (LC) and Rakusen v Jepson [2020] UKUT 298 (LC). [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
Conyers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 11:34 pm
Martin, as an entry point into a discussion on the constitutional limits of criminalizing acts that occur in public because, in the words of Justice White in his concurrence in Powell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 1:25 am
After a trial before Judge Hacon (Martin and Another v Kogan [2017] EWHC [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:58 pm
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 10:44 am
(opinion here) and a 2000 Appellate Division, Martin v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
