Search for: "Marty Lederman"
Results 781 - 800
of 807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2007, 7:50 am
"Update on the Sixth Circuit Litigation Challenging the NSA's Terrorist Surveillance Program": Marty Lederman has this post today at the "Balkinization" blog. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
Matthew Yglesias -- after reading what Marty Lederman had to say -- is sorry he agreed with me so much about the Democrats and Iraq. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:46 pm
All that said, it seems clear to me that what Kennedy is proposing, supported legally here in Marty Lederman's unfair attack on Joe Biden, is NOT consistent with the Constitution. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:51 am
Marty Lederman Senator Kennedy is today introducing this legislation, the operative provision of which reads:Prohibition. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:01 pm
Peter Spiro, Marty Lederman, Dave Hoffman and others are wondering about this question over at Opinio Juris. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 12:38 pm
In the past year and a half, I have added the blogging team that Jack established and that Sandy Levinson, Marty Lederman and so many others have enlivened, to my own friends, and beyond them, a circle of readers - some crotchety, some exasperating, and others who offer essential moral support (and even a keen editorial eye and blue pencil, which must be what every poster hopes for). [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Marty Lederman, Padilla (Sept. 9, 2005)9. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Marty Lederman says: How about Congress "getting him the message," Senator Reid, by actually requiring him to act? [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:52 pm
[Thanks to Aaron Stemplewicz & to Marty Lederman via Religionlaw, for the cert. petition and reply brief links.] [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 7:24 pm
Over at SCOTUSblog, posts by Tom Goldstein and Marty Lederman highlight how light the Supreme Court docket is this Term and ask whether there "are any particular categories of cases -- defined by subject-matter, reasons-for-grant, or otherwise -- to which the Court is being insufficiently attentive. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 12:34 pm
Marty Lederman has blogged about the issue, too. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 1:54 am
Craig Williams, The Halloween Queen Fights City Hall Over Sign Law David Lat, Stripper's Remorse: That Cat Is Way Out of the Bag Jack Balkin, A Dunk in the Water for Clarity; Marty Lederman, Yes, It's a No-Brainer: Waterboarding Is Torture We're rascals, scoundrels, villains, and knaves Drink up, me 'earties, yo ho We're devils and black sheep, really bad eggs Drink up, me 'earties, yo ho KipEsquire, The Unconstitutional Censorship Law that Just… [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 12:48 pm
" Marty Lederman responds:The reason John and his colleagues are so spooked by the prospect of judicial review is that they want the President to be able to act in accord with very radical and questionable legal interpretations, without any risk that anyone will ever call them on it. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:07 am
[Of course, there are many superb lawyers in the Justice Department with integrity--Marty Lederman of Balkinization was one of them.]. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 8:14 pm
I know that her articles are literally the first things I turn to (besides Marty Lederman's analyses) when cases come down. [read post]
23 Sep 2006, 3:24 pm
Marty Lederman responded very substantively in the comments. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 11:46 am
Jack Balkin, here; David Luban, here; Sandy Levinson, here; Marty Lederman, here. [read post]
8 Sep 2006, 1:45 pm
" Marty Lederman has this post today at the "Balkinization" blog. [read post]
Useful blogosphere analysis of yesterday's Bush administration war on terrorism proposed legislation
7 Sep 2006, 4:17 pm
Marty Lederman also comments as well - but the place to go for Marty's analysis of the proposed legislation and the new army manual is over at Balkinization, here, here, and here, and I'm sure more to follow. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:33 am
We'll start with Marty Lederman's comments - although we sometimes (often?) [read post]
