Search for: "Matter of Adler"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
This matters because if all Congress sought to do was reference exchanges established under Section 1311, there would have been no reason to add this additional language, and the SG was able to offer no credible explanation for why this language is there. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 pm
Mitchell said that some of the matters he handles are ones that the big law firms "would never touch with a ten-foot pole" for fear of offending liberals. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:17 am
These missteps may well matter politically and may unduly complicate what should be a rather straightforward argument. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:27 am
I further wonder whether any such privilege that Pence could claim has been waived because some of his staff have already testified on these matters. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
The second was "whether the First Amendment permits defamation liability for expressing a subjective opinion about a matter of scientific or political controversy," such as the validity of Mann's research, which has been the subject of extensive criticism and multiple investigations. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:02 am
Click-to-Call Technologies, concerning inter partes review of patent claims also had an interesting 7-2 lineup (if, perhaps, less interesting subject matter). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
What matters, Justice Antonin Scalia has said, is “not what Congress would have wanted, but what Congress enacted. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:21 am
This matters because power plants are responsible for nearly a third of domestic greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm
The state legislature refused to act, however, leaving the matter to the Governor and the courts. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
Did this matter? [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
But work with the shadow we must, for "unless we wish anarchy to prevail within the federal judicial system," precedent must be followed "by the lower federal courts no matter how misguided the judges of those courts may think it to be. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:49 pm
President Trump stated the matter bluntly: "If the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is out, we'll have a plan that is far better than Obamacare. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:27 pm
" Because "there is only one reasonable construction" of the Guideline, the "court has no business deferring to any other reading, no matter how much the [Commission] insists it would make more sense. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 7:33 am
Should not their consent matter too? [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
This is a close and difficult standing question, and it's particularly important as the FCC sought to use standing as a means of precluding judicial review of its efforts to leverage its authority over licenses to reach matters otherwise beyond the FCC's reach. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:16 am
As with the OHSA standard, the details matter, and we will know much more about the legal strengths and weaknesses once we see what CMS actually does and how it justifies its actions. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
The administrative state was able to operate before Chevron was decided (and before it was made the basis of a doctrine), and the administrative state will persist no matter how these cases are resolved. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
What matters for future warming is the overall level in the atmosphere. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:51 pm
Today, there is no principle and no norm in the judicial nominations process that either side would not violate itself and simultaneously demand the other side observe as a matter of decency and inter-branch comity. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:34 pm
Nor, for that matter, does a defendant have an adequate opportunity to assert constitutional violations in the state proceeding when the prosecution itself is the constitutional violation. [read post]
