Search for: "Matter of Barnette"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
State elections ordinarily rate little note on a blog devoted to military justice matters, but here’s an exception to the rule: California attorney Orly Taitz, the so-called “birther queen” who championed the anti-Obama cause on her own behalf and achieved CAAFlog fame in cases involving military litigants CPT Connie Rhodes and CPT Pamela Barnett, is a candidate in today’s primary election in California. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
Barnett is quite right when he argues that there is no such thing as a consensual encounter initiated by police. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:18 pm
Can I encourage everyone who’s been following my blog on these and related matters to take the opportunity to have a constructive say in this enquiry. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:21 am
(Randy Barnett) Legal Theory Blog guru Larry Solum just named The Subjects of the Constitution the Download of the Week, and I concur. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:24 am
(Randy Barnett) Read David Bernstein’s excellent blog post. [read post]
16 May 2010, 5:47 am
Of course, it isn't the particular terminology that matters, but the substance of the distinction is not something that legal theorists can do without. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am
The defendants, as the movants, failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm
However, he shows how it might succeed, and is worth reading on this matter. [read post]
Strauss Charges Texas Legislature to Look at Local Ordinances Governing Surface Use in Barnett Shale
31 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm
In some cases, municipal ordinances are so stringent that as a practical matter they prevent drilling within city limits. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 7:25 am
Randy Barnett et al. and Ilya Somin argue otherwise, but they overlook the necessary and proper clause. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
The same goes for the majority of the Federalist Society-affiliated conservative and libertarian scholars who have written on these matters for the last 15–20 years or longer. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:22 am
Given the Founders rather clear intent on the matter, would it really be surprising to see this theory of the Constitution surface in new ways? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Patents are not awarded for academic theories, no matter how groundbreaking or necessary to the later patentable inventions of others. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:59 am
But the victory that matters most tonight goes beyond the laws and far past the numbers. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 am
For that matter, no justice seemed at all interested in the original meaning of any aspect of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:18 am
UPDATE: If you want to read my op-ed, a reader helpfully writes how to do it: If you go to Google News and search [Randy Barnett McDonald], the second result leads to the full, non-subscriber version of your op-ed. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
In recent years, originalists ranging from Jack Balkin to Keith Whittington to Randy Barnett have argued in varying fashion that an originalist interpretive approach follows logically from "our commitment to a written constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
No matter how innovative an idea is, there’s got to be some way to bring the idea to market in order for the public to capture some benefit. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
Daniel Barnett’s regular news alert brought the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill to my attention. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:59 am
(Whittington's work was first in time and influenced Barnett). [read post]
