Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
On the other hand, one must acknowledge the difference between law and politics here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am
This expectation is a reasonable one as a matter of probability. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 1:13 pm
It turns out he and Baroni attended law school together at the University of Virginia. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
Vladeck is Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Scholarship at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
Thus, questions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de novo rather than under the deferential standard applied by AEDPA, i.e., whether the state court unreasonably applied clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
But Congress also knew that the Supreme Court had not resolved this question. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am
See App. to Pet. for Cert. 3a–4a. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm
As in so many things, the law on this is clear but nearly toothless.The criminally accused have a right to counsel. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:53 am
Arave, 455 F.3d 926, 942-43 (9th Cir. 2006), cert. granted, 128 S.Ct. 532, 532-33 (2007), vacated as moot, 128 S.Ct. 749 (2008). [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:17 pm
"The defendant successfully moved to compel arbitration, but the Court deferred the decision as to whether it could be brought as a class action to the arbitrator.Noting it was a close question, the arbitrator held that the matter could proceed as a class action. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
As a non-trivial aside, I should say I’m not sure why it should matter so much. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf questions the distinction between taxpayer-funded government speech and laws compelling private subsidization of private speech in the case, while at ACSblog Charlotte Garden observes that “five Justices seemed poised to adopt the view that public sector agency fee requirements—under which union-represented workers must pay their share of the costs of contract negotiation and administration—are unconstitutional because those… [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:58 pm
Mazzone also questions whether the Justices’ clerkship hiring patterns really matter all that much. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Instead, the question the Court has always asked is, if Congress has the Article I power to proscribe the conduct in question, whether an exception to the Constitution's jury-trial clauses justifies subjecting the [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:17 pm
But in its cert-stage reply brief, it described the question presented differently. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:33 pm
The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:07 am
Until cert was granted. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
That's why I needed to think about it a little more after my initial reaction to Google's cert petition. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Sandoz, those factual findings should be given deference even though the ultimate determination of definiteness is a question of law. [read post]
