Search for: "Matter of Martin B."
Results 781 - 800
of 920
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 4:00 am
Still, it would be difficult to find a single law faculty that opposes them on grounds of principle, or for that matter, many individual law teachers who do so.[2] By contrast, legal fundamentalists tend to believe that “law”—as a field of study, as a profession, as a social institution—has an essential meaning, a core content, and distinctive institutional characteristics that may change slowly over time but at any given moment can be authoritatively specified. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
Can it use Martin Luther King Jr.? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:36 am
The court says the FTC endorsement guidelines can’t form the basis of a Florida consumer protection claim. * Martin v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Reasonable royalty damages for indirect infringement not limited to ‘Specific Acts of Infringement’: Tyco Healthcare Group LP d/b/a Vnus Medical Technologies v. biolitec, Inc. et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:30 am
Abstract: The present subject matter provides systems, methods, software, and data structures for patent mapping, storage, and searching. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
(Id.)B. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
(Rowe, Martin and Moreau JJ. concurring): “This is an appeal from R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
June 2, 2004); Martin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
§ 541.203(b). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Every now and then we run into a decision that we think is wrong in so many different ways that we call it an example of “spherical error” – that is, error no matter how one looks at it. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
” Petitioners further argue that the board “fail[ed] to apply proper pedagogical and ethical standards” and “relied on a mischaracterization of the First Amendment” in voting to retain the materials in its library collection.Respondent argues that the board acted reasonably in following its policy for review of challenged materials.[2]First, I must address two preliminary matters. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
” Petitioners further argue that the board “fail[ed] to apply proper pedagogical and ethical standards” and “relied on a mischaracterization of the First Amendment” in voting to retain the materials in its library collection.Respondent argues that the board acted reasonably in following its policy for review of challenged materials.[2]First, I must address two preliminary matters. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 10:39 am
” The panel will feature Martin Baron, Carrie Cordero, Jameel Jaffer, Alberto Mora, and Laura Poitras. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm
Miller’s statement always seemed to be a preposterous one to me, and I wrote about it at the time, saying that I found it impossible to accept that there were “hundreds if not thousands” of lawyers scamming homeowners in California or anywhere else for that matter. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm
Miller’s statement always seemed to be a preposterous one to me, and I wrote about it at the time, saying that I found it impossible to accept that there were “hundreds if not thousands” of lawyers scamming homeowners in California or anywhere else for that matter. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 5:16 pm
The SEC Anti-Fraud Provisions Section 10(b) (codified in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:37 am
§ 213(b)(3). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Dec. 14,2007) (opinion grantingmotion for stay of execution) ("District Court Opinion"), and is attached to the Application asAppendix B. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
§ 1225(b)(1))—that Congress added in 1996 to respond to an increase in immigrants at the southern border. [read post]
