Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
" Yesterday the Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
It also would cap the Supreme Court at nine justices even though such a proposal fell squarely outside the convention’s mandate. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:23 am
In fact, the Supreme Court in both U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, which heard arguments on the merits in January in the case, Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
United States,] the infamous 1944 Supreme Court decision blessing internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:21 pm
The Supreme Court may eventually fix this problem, which was created by its own earlier decisions. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:30 am
IJ has litigated (and often prevailed) in numerous other constitutional property rights cases, including a recent Supreme Court victory in Timbs v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:24 pm
Colorado, New Mexico hopes to sue Colorado in the Supreme Court; as the federal government explained, New Mexico claims that “contamination from abandoned mines in Colorado has polluted New Mexico’s rivers and caused economic harm. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm
In it, the court will decide whether the Constitution gives state legislatures the power to make rules for federal elections without any supervision from state courts. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am
A plurality of the court, in the 2000 decision Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Here is how Tymkovich (who, by the way, argued on behalf of the state of Colorado unsuccessfully in Romer v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Under State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
The appellate court’s holding, she said, stood on Colorado state law. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am
Briefly: At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that “[t]his may be the heyday for state solicitors general,” with five former state SGs on President Donald Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees and a report in a new study that “in the last three terms, 41 state SGs or their deputies argued before the high court—nearly double the number a decade ago. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
As the court stated in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
This case presents the same issue on which the Supreme Court split 4-4 in Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
These laws raise potential First Amendment concerns, as the Supreme Court has refused to sustain regulations of false speech based solely on a compelling state interest in "truthful discourse" without additional fraudulent or defamatory effects. [read post]
