Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 4:31 am
In Mazurek v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
The Commission reduced the award by 75% from the $6,500 awarded to the Complainant by the Administrative Judge because her emotional distress was not only caused by the discrimination.In Mazurek v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Stec v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR SE295 and Loiseau v France application no 46809/99, 18 November 2003 appear to contain suggestions that a civil right is an 'assetable right' akin to a 'private right arguably recognised under domestic law' or 'an individual right of which the applicant may consider himself the holder'. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:35 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:36 am
Here, Perry distinguished other agencies, such as Social Security, that do not, he said, conduct adversarial hearings, in the sense that a private citizen will have his or her "fate" decided.The government's position. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
Reporters, columnists, and pundits almost unanimously agree that Project 2025 describes Trump’s plans for his next administration, despite his campaign’s effort to distance Trump from the Project’s recommendations.In a post on the social media site Truth Social, Donald Trump stated: I know nothing about Project 2025,And then: I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and… [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:46 pm
The early complaints were decided under the Republican Administration of George Bush for the most part. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
The anatomy of a disputed claim for GML §207-c benefitsParker v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 50957(U), Decided on May 26, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Ferris D. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
It will end on Friday 24 May 2024. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 1:51 pm
"In addition to having the support of deputies, Etchelecu is supported by the Minister of Social Development, Alcibiades Vásquez; the Secretary of Goals, Jorge González; and the former Minister of the Presidency Álvaro Alemán.While Blandón is backed by the ministers of Labor, Luis Ernesto Carles; of Agricultural Development, Eduardo Carles; of Environment, Emilio Sempris; and the administrator of the Panama Maritime Authority, Jorge… [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 10:39 am
Circuit explained that “the ‘benefits’ exclusion has a very broad scope and … applies to … all rulemaking relating to old age, survivors, disability, and health insurance payments made under the Social Security Act. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
James, No. 22-cv-627 (SDNY, May 24, 2022). [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:40 pm
LendingTree LLC operates a mortgage brokering business that connects consumers interested in securing a mortgage loan with lenders willing to provide such loans. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:35 am
Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:06 pm
The Social Security Administration recently scrapped a proposal to consider social media posts as part of the evaluation process for disability claims. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) (“[T]he prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:10 am
Resolving disputes involving the payment of a New York State Employees' Retirement System member's death benefit to a beneficiaryRice v Dinapoli, 2009 NY Slip Op 50979(U), Decided on May 21, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Joseph C. [read post]
