Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 781 - 800 of 2,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
A: Copyright laws differ between jurisdictions, but commentators often overstate the scope of the opinion by the Court of Justice of the EU in SAS Institute v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:35 pm
The IPKat's poll on L'Oréal v Bellure closed earlier this week. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am by chief
Out of the respondents, only the second respondent took part in the appeal (both at UT level and at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
Singularis not precluded from bringing the claim The court rejected two arguments by Daiwa that Singularis was precluded from bringing its claim for breach of Quincecare duty: The first argument was that the claim was being brought on behalf of Singularis’ creditors (and not Singularis), who could not rely on the Quincecare duty of care that Daiwa owed to its customer, Singularis.Rose J rejected this argument.She held that Singularis was not precluded from pursuing the claim.The… [read post]