Search for: "P. Rogers"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 11:57 am
This is a good summary of the case law in this area.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:48 am
It also has wonderfully on point cartoons and comics from the Wall Street Journal and P. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:38 pm
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams Law School writes in with the following critique of the Latif decision and praise of Judge David Tatel’s dissent. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
Officer did not use the power of his office to observe unlawful activity or gain access to evidence not available to a lawful citizen.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:22 am
Rogers Ineffective Assistance: Pinholster and Moore Confrontation Clause: Bullcoming and Bryant Other Cases Last Term by the Numbers So here are four themes that stand out for me, either because of their prominence in majority opinions, or dissents, or both. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:08 pm
by Kevin Jon Heller My thanks to Dave Glazier, Detlev Vagts, Roger Clark, and Devin Pendas for their insightful comments on my book. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Rogers, decided in the 2010 Supreme Court Term. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
by Roger S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
This article discusses the Marsh Law Firm's pioneering work to secure criminal restitution for our client Amy. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:17 am
Keough - 8th District Court of Appeals John P. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:32 am
Error was harmless where issue of victims consent was fully addressed in victim's police report and testimony at sentencing hearing.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Stuhan & Sean P. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Rogers in the Supreme Court last year, successfully convincing the Court to hold that lawyers are not required to be provided to indigent litigants in civil cases, even when incarceration may result. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Stuhan & Sean P. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
Rogers (Harvard Law Review, Vol. 125, p. 78, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
Rogers, 131 S. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
Dannel P. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:46 am
., that he had complied with the previously imposed flight conditions, and had not received notice of a hearing he missed to determine that the Defendant was a flight risk for a third degree felony.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:54 am
Fact that PDR was missing a comprehensive evaluation and report had DJJ'S probation plan, in error, was not fault of the juvenile causing him to be allowed to be sentenced again.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]