Search for: "P. v. Smith" Results 781 - 800 of 1,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 9:56 am by Meg Martin
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On Tuesday 27 April 201 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P,  Henderson and Warby LJJ) heard the appeal in case of Riley v Sivier. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 |… [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
Smith, 876 N.W.2d 310, 336 (Minnesota Supreme Court 2016). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  563 A.2d at 126-27.Numerous other courts throughout the country have held, similarly to Smith v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am by Law Lady
Child support -- Modification -- Administrative support order -- Trial court fundamentally erred when it reduced father's monthly child support obligations without notice or hearingDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Loretta Sermon, Cherral Smith, and Yata Frichelle Canty, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm by cdw
The Virginia Supreme Court in William Joseph Burns v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, a pending cert petition that asks the court to review the Arkansas Supreme Court’s holding “that the U.S. [read post]