Search for: "Parker v Parker"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
Here is how the Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Droney) sums it up:In District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 6:51 am
The religious organization won in the district court, but loses in the Court of Appeals, finding the notice requirement is not compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment.The case is CompassCare v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The district court said that plaintiff did not suffer a substantial limitation on a major life activity, and the Second Circuit (Leval, Cabranes and Parker) agrees. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:26 am
Other circuits have interpreted the PLRA similarly, and now the Second Circuit (Menashi, Parker and Lohier) joins them. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Since the company is exempt, the employees are denied overtime.The case is Hill v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:17 am
But the Court of Appeals affirms and plaintiff gets zero.The case is Warr v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
He loses the case, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:13 am
The Second Circuit (Katzmann, Parker and Wesley) disagrees.Filing a grievance is protected activity, we know that. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 6:11 am
The Court of Appeals agrees that he cannot win the case, so the free speech case is over..The case is Baltas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 11:52 am
The case is Callahan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
Parker? [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 8:18 am
Young v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:10 am
Parker v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:18 am
The Court of Appeals has reversed the findings of the Social Security Administration and found that a woman is entitled to Supplemental Security Income because she is in fact disabled and cannot work a full range of jobs.The case is Rucker v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:31 am
This case is Cole v. [read post]
