Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 11:52 am
The case is Callahan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:18 am
The Court of Appeals has reversed the findings of the Social Security Administration and found that a woman is entitled to Supplemental Security Income because she is in fact disabled and cannot work a full range of jobs.The case is Rucker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Since the company is exempt, the employees are denied overtime.The case is Hill v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 8:18 am
Young v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:35 am
The case is Kajoshaj v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:57 am
The Court of Appeals resolved these issues in a case involving the Mayor of the Village of Moncticello.The case is Johnstone v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:26 am
Other circuits have interpreted the PLRA similarly, and now the Second Circuit (Menashi, Parker and Lohier) joins them. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The district court said that plaintiff did not suffer a substantial limitation on a major life activity, and the Second Circuit (Leval, Cabranes and Parker) agrees. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
He loses the case, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Smith v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:31 am
This case is Cole v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:10 am
Parker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 6:11 am
The Court of Appeals agrees that he cannot win the case, so the free speech case is over..The case is Baltas v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:43 am
SEE, PARKER V. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:10 am
Parker v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
One way to see this case is as a battle between Parker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
If a provider has determined that a subluxation is present based on an x-ray,[v] a Medicare contractor will likely take into consideration when the x-ray was taken and how much time has elapsed before a course of treatment was initiated. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]
