Search for: "People v Baker" Results 781 - 800 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Not so very far away, Birgit Clark has just taken up her new position as a trade mark attorney in the London office of international law firm Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Sanford, Partner, Baker Hostetler FTC should issue a report with factfinding. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Take a swig of some good strong coffee because we’ve got a baker’s dozen first-time relists to get through before you pass out/return to your regularly scheduled programming. [read post]