Search for: "People v Deal"
Results 781 - 800
of 11,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
In the old days, people sometimes bought games because of appealing box designs, but threw them away after an hour or so of playing.If impulse purchases were banned, and with Apple having made it pretty much impossible to make serious money on iOS with in-game advertising, the business model might shift to subscriptions--which Apple would probably even prefer.That said, it definitely is interesting when a federal judge dealing with a case like Epic v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:36 am
That’s a big deal. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:44 pm
The Ontario Divisional Court is going to hear an appeal of the Warman v Wilkins-Fournier case, in which the issue is whether an internet intermediary (here a blog site) must disclose the names of people alleged to have defamed someone. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am
The space where people interact and comment are therefore not government speech. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
It destroys people's lives. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:31 am
Wood v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
" These claims are hard to win, but they are winnable.The case is Stephenson v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:46 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:41 pm
See Nken v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 am
"Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 8:44 pm
GDLS-C employees 2,100 people in London, an supports a supply chain of about 500 small and medium-sized Canadian businesses. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 8:57 am
Lastly, there are 'Cobbs pleas', given their name after the case People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
A verdict is repugnant if an acquittal on one charge conclusively negates a necessary element of a crime for which the defendant was convicted (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1 [1981]). [read post]
