Search for: "People v Guess"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
Yesterday (Monday, March 4, 2019) a Qualcomm v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
(Ackermann v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 8:03 am
SitePro v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
[By Venkat with comments from Eric] Eagle v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
" Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
It came from here, the What’s Your Price website, where people pay for dates; more attractive people garner higher payouts. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
The US Supreme Court is expected to hand down its judgment in the high profile, heavily debated case of Florida v Department of Health and Human Services before its 2012 term draws to a close at the end of June. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
Ever since Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
I doubt I will be quite so prolific this week as I am going to be back on a suppression hearing on Tuesday and maybe Wednesday in People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:20 am
But now this case - Stop The Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm
See People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am
Yesterday, in a Supreme Court case called Brnovich v. [read post]
