Search for: "People v Holder"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Holder for this blog, while Kelly Phillips Erb does the same at Forbes. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Boesch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Boesch v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Boesch v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
By Eric Goldman 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
(Cardoso v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
(Cardoso v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Thys Co., holding that a patent-holder cannot collect royalties after the patent expires. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Lest anyone think this is merely a poor choice by a panel from the 10th Circuit, consider the decision of the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
In Barton v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:38 am
Vernor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:06 am
In 2010, he was the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in Lewis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Then Buffy v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
Maloney v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
On February 13, 2018, in Forman v. [read post]
