Search for: "People v Legall" Results 781 - 800 of 31,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
  But I do think she knew it was "wrong" to spit at other people and to kick them in the stomach? [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am by Crystal Pardue
These protections are essential given centuries-long attempts to destroy Native peoples through genocide and massacres, forced assimilation, and legalized kidnapping during the boarding school era. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:07 am by Phil Dixon
These more specific laws automatically terminate on July 1, 2021, and apply only to a very narrow set of people. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:43 pm
Starting today, we're enabling people everywhere to find and read full text legal opinions from U.S. federal and state district, appellate and supreme courts using Google Scholar. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:16 pm
She can legally give him pot.I'm all for making broad -- and even potentially unnecessary -- holdings sometimes. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:34 pm
Sure, it means that there's legally sufficient evidence for a conviction, of course, because a jury could indeed decide to believe a total liar like the informant here. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:50 am by John LeBlanc
If you thought that the legal battle over the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") was put to rest in NFIB v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Search queries are an example of a way that people interact with legal materials, and these datasets could be significant sources of data into how people understand and interact with the law. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The failure to notify the Mexican consulate of the Californian detention of a suspected criminal of Mexican nationality did not adversely affect his legal rights, the California Supreme Court decided in The People v. [read post]