Search for: "People v Lord" Results 781 - 800 of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm by Giles Peaker
Porchlight helps people to find, but cannot guarantee access to, permanent housing. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am by NL
In this case, Mr Raw (incidentally a veteran of the Kay v Lambeth short-life housing battles and still in the same property despite an order for possession being made) had applied as homeless to Lambeth. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:51 am by NL
In this case, Mr Raw (incidentally a veteran of the Kay v Lambeth short-life housing battles and still in the same property despite an order for possession being made) had applied as homeless to Lambeth. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:04 am by Isobel Williams
A bronze horse is poised on a swallow in flight, a gift from the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, not dissimilar to Lord Mance’s emphasis on the Claimant’s family life in the Supreme Court case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd in the context of privacy claims, the judgment in AXB v BXA serves to illustrate that the Court will continue to place great emphasis when the Claimant’s family members, in particular spouses and young children, are also plainly adversely affected by both the Defendant’s course of conduct and the publicity that… [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals annoucement on new COVID-19 restrictions for England (1 November 2020). [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:40 am by INFORRM
  This point was clearly recognised in Campbell v MGN Ltd: as Lord Hoffmann said, it is about ‘the right to control dissemination of information about one’s private life and the right to the esteem and respect of other people’. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Bobby Stroup
For example, one key due date is in Section 8(b)(iv)–(v). [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The unanimous decision by Lady Hale and Lord Reed, R (Miller) v Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2)) breaks new and, in my view, shaky constitutional ground. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:55 am by Vikram Raghavan
An idol is not a precondition for a “deity” to exist in Hindu theology and jurisprudence, the deity can in the words of the Supreme Court in Ram Janki Deity v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, Lord Camden, rejected this argument with flourish. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This approach has been endorsed and adopted in the recent case National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon, Anatolie Stati and others. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
 They have brazenly desecrated and defiled the national flag and emblem, incited Hong Kong people to oppose China and the Communist Party of China (‘CPC’), besiege Central People's Government (‘CPG’) offices in Hong Kong, and discriminate and ostracize Mainland personnel in Hong Kong. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
A Parliamentary Privilege (Defamation) Bill prepared by Lord Lester QC has been introduced in the House of Lords. [read post]