Search for: "People v Samuels"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 2:35 pm
Julie Samuels explains this by arguing that the current “patent system fails to recognize how people create and use technology. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:31 am
In that ruling, Grutter v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:02 am
A district court initially ruled in favor of Apple and its claim that a 1977 Supreme Court decision, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
" So reads the first line of today's 8-1 SCOTUS decision in the Snyder v Phelps case.By now, the story is familiar to all of us: Albert Snyder's son, Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, was killed in action in Iraq. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Leah Litman “discuss their favorite and least favorite moments of the … hearings. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 10:01 am
The case, Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Referring to the 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:14 pm
., applnts v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 1:01 am
The 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 12:18 pm
” The committee’s ranking Republican, Jim Jordan of Ohio, meanwhile, said Democrats’ calls for court reform were “intimidation” and falsely claimed that no Democrat has condemned the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:41 am
Kennedy, and by Justice Samuel A. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:49 am
For pregnant people, abortion may be the lifesaving intervention needed. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:32 am
Liberal groups cite appearances at quasi-political events by Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito as examples. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
“I would never underestimate his ability to influence people. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
Judging from this morning’s oral argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
” As Justice Samuel Alito explained a couple of years ago, the First Amendment “does not protect true threats” because they “inflict great harm and have little if any social value. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
In practice, courts have not been well disposed to Title III plaintiffs, as scholars such as Ruth Colker and Samuel Bagenstos have demonstrated. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
It May Confuse People And It May Be A Crime. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 1:27 pm
On Thursday, in United States v. [read post]
