Search for: "People v Then"
Results 781 - 800
of 72,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2020, 7:48 am
This lawsuit alleges that social media providers contributed to the 2016 Pulse Nightclub terrorist attack in Orlando that killed 49 people and injured dozens more. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:35 am
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in DC v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:44 pm
Percoco v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:19 am
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in DC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm
As I blogged about earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 11:25 am
Ken (Popehat) White for the position that "cancel culture" is a cynical ploy to undermine counter-speech v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
KF8215.75 .R69 2018 Royster, Judith V. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 3:43 am
The conference in Warner v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
See Lin v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:25 am
R (Baia and another v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
R (Moore) v Skipton Fund Ltd [2010] EWHC 3070 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 308 “For the purposes of a claim for an ex gratia payment from public funds, there was nothing irrational or unfair in requiring certain people infected with hepatitis C through treatment with NHS blood or blood products prior to September 1991, to show that spontaneous clearance of the virus after a period of six months had occurred. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:26 am
R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 246 “Where, in relation to a question whether user of land had been user as of right, the issue of deference arose as between a landowner and other people making use of the land, the question was how the position would have appeared to the landowner, rather than to the other users, and what would matter to the landowner would be the fact of deference, not the reasons for it. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:38 pm
In People v Tzitzikalakis, 2007 NY Slip Op 01335, the New York Court of Appeals considered the issue of whether, at a restitution hearing, the prosecution was required to prove the out-of-pocket loss... [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
To understand what’s going on, we have to go back a few years to the marriage equality victories at the Supreme Court in 2015 in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:03 pm
From People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:53 pm
There was no agreement between two people, so no conspiracy.The question is whether John's act constitutes pandering. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
Yeah, at some level, that's interesting, to some people at least. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Part of the lawyer's job therefore is to facilitate communications with people outside. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
However, that's in a section that's all about credits for people sentenced to prison and who have been "convicted" (rather than having their sentence deferred). [read post]
