Search for: "People v. Graves" Results 781 - 800 of 1,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[29] Therefore, the assumptions in this analysis call into question the sufficiency of the grave-danger determination because they produce an estimate in which “the actual number of lives saved is uncertain, and is likely to be substantially less than [the stated basis for the grave-danger determination]. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:35 am
Most people would never notice it, would not understand it, and after all, not that many people are exactly Rosa Parks types who stand up to authority figures who are about to hold their lives in their hands. [read post]
” The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) celebrated the ruling, saying, “The administration now faces a choice: Follow the law, or try to block the ruling from taking effect in 14 days, leaving people seeking safety in grave danger. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:57 am by Jon Hyman
As someone who thinks that people should not have to choose between having a family and holding a job, I am rooting for Emily Herx. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
If so, or if one is left in grave doubt, the conviction cannot stand.' Clay v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am by Vicky Conway
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 8:28 am
One of the dangerous target of the virus are the elderly people and Cuba has a high level of adult population. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:04 pm by Cynthia Godsoe
Supreme Court recently addressed this issue, in Camreta v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
 (The complaint in the case — Naruto, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and ANTJE ENGELHARDT, Ph.D. v David Slater — can be found here.) [read post]