Search for: "People v. House" Results 781 - 800 of 11,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
To prioritise the Claimant, would potentially have a huge impact on the other people on the waiting list for housing. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:38 am by Eric Goldman
how did Day find these videos–was it by following people she knew personally, or did she randomly stumble on it, in which case how did the videos get into the poster’s hands? [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
 The informant has killed twelve people instead of previously raiding twelve stash houses. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm by Dean Stowers and Nick Sarcone
 The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:09 pm by Richard Hunt
HUD is clearly much less interested in helping people obey the law than in punishing people who fail to obey it. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
People do not build brick houses around themselves with no doors or tools for renovation. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Heald and others v LB Brent [2009] EWCA Civ 930 is just out concerning the outsourcing of s 202 Housing Act 1996 reviews by Brent to Minos Perdios’ company Housing Reviews Ltd. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cuomo, (ED NY, filed 10/8/2020) reads in part:The governor now proposes to limit in-person attendance at all "Houses of Worship" to the lesser of 10 people or 25% of church capacity in certain designated geographical areas, and to the lesser of 25 people or 33% of church capacity in others. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm by Kim Krawiec
Barak’s recent paper on the “rabbinic cartels” reminded me that I wanted to provide some updates on Kamakahi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
--> Guest Post: Vasujith Ram Recently in Lily Thomas v Union of India, the Court held that Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RPA) was ultra vires the Constitution. [read post]