Search for: "People v. More"
Results 781 - 800
of 48,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 10:12 am
But that principle usually doesn't apply to attorney general's offices, who are able to take a broader -- and more informed -- view.But there's an exception to every rule. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
"I guess having the state buy you meat -- or, more likely, meat-like items -- for six years is another way to go "camping" too. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:03 pm
Depends on which you value more. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
On the other hand, unless you're going to call any crime collectively committed by gang members as "for the benefit of" the gang" -- so they can giggle and taunt others about it, and feel collectively more brazen about their violations of the law -- it seems a pretty big stretch to say that was transpired here was designed to benefit the gang.So both the majority and the dissent have a point. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:31 pm
And, I hope, at least a tiny bit more self-control. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:03 pm
More bad news. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am
Definitely worth the investment of social resources.Though I'll also mention that the Court of Appeal itself spends a lot more than $24 by deciding to publish the opinion. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
But I'll share it anyway: I'm somewhat internally more reluctant to believe guilt in closely-disputed cases when the sentence is (essentially) life in prison as opposed to, say, a decade. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:39 pm
None are more so.Amazing. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:17 am
It's good, on occasion, to revisit these grand issues and try to get the law to make more sense. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:50 pm
So when Justice Huffman -- or the even-more-cell-phone-provider-challenged-than-I-am law clerk in his chambers -- repeatedly misspells that particular word in this opinion, it definitely caught my eye. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:29 pm
Because if you don't, you may well engage in conduct that's clearly -- or, as Justice Gomes more tactfully (but equally correctly) puts it, "patently" -- erroneous. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
In a declaration, the Appeals Clerk for the Amador County Superior Court stated that she had just discovered that this appeal, and two others, had been 'filed and forgotten,' and that defendant, who had received a two-year sentence, 'is more than likely out of prison by now.' Once we were notified of the delay in these cases, we processed them expeditiously. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:34 pm
As well as more remunerative. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
There's a "sentencing enhancement" that says you're punished more if you molest two victims. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
"Over the years, I've learned more than I ever wanted to know about bail forfeitures as a result of reading the (numerous) opinions that address the subject. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
The New York State courts have departed from the second prong of Strictland, adopting a rule somewhat more favorable to defendants as in People v Turner. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
Moreover, the 50,000 US Dollars for damages is not that much more than the approximate 30,000 US Dollars that the Strasbourg Court has ordered the state to pay victims of involuntary sterilization (in 2011–12 cases V.C. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
People v Bulgin, 2010 NY Slip Op 20290, 2010 N.Y. [read post]
