Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 781 - 800 of 13,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  Many of these same people likely would become delegates in an actual Article V convention. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:15 am
People affiliated with all local political parties, Democrats and Republicans, single mothers, the elderly, people with disabilities, all stood shoulder to shoulder with thousands of young people, the LGBTQ community, and women protesting in the streets. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:58 pm
So, for example, the Chief of Police has been more likely to say to political marchers "You've got to have at least 200 people show up to be able to march on the street" than to non-political marchers. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:38 pm
Since most people that talk about "judicial activism" are political hacks seeking the favor of non-lawyers, I don't take them seriously. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:59 am
Following the oral argument in Heller, people have been having a good old time making fun of the Justices and their pretty transparent political motivations. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
If this Court were to endorse and condone this abrogation of Hopi law, then all of the Hopi Tribe, the Hopi people, would suffer a terrible precedent in the Hopi way of life. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:42 pm by Joey Fishkin
Valeo in 1976.In Arizona Free Enterprise v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:59 am
 Perhaps, as people adjust to the overruling and face political participation, they will withdraw from the position that the pollsters call "supporting abortion rights. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am by INFORRM
But not everything a politician says is political (see Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] EWHC 2533 (Admin) [36] where it was judged that the then-London mayor Ken Livingstone’s comments were not expressing political opinion, but were instead to be seen as simply as the offensive abuse of a journalist). [read post]