Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 781 - 800
of 72,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
Because the science here -- at least for people like this -- just ain't that good. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
In Capitol People First v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:14 pm
By David Worley In Zagaja v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
V. 51, no. 6 (2001), pp. 48–53. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
We will see where that takes the people, the state, and the revolution. [read post]
Admitting DNA Evidence was Harmless Error in Murder Case – People v. Williams, 2020 NY Slip Op 02123
1 Apr 2020, 2:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Feuer v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
For example, they're not going to overrule New York Times v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
In fact, People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 3:14 pm
Indeed, we've even invented a term for people who give commands from precisely such a role: we say that they're speaking from the "peanut gallery". [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
There's not much of a constituency for the select group of people who kill someone and then burn down their house. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Gerberding is with a couple of other people, and they've set up a shopping cart with a tarp on it and multiple pallets as their camp. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm
Deterrence -- either special or general -- seems a fairly weak rationale for slamming the guy as well, since people hopped up on DMT and 'shrooms are hardly thinking seriously about the consequences of their conduct nor likely to be affected by a contemporaneous thought about whether they'll be spending 5, 15, 30, or whatever years in prison as a result of their offense.Retribution seems like the strongest argument for seriously punishing the guy. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
It's a misdemeanor offense, so it goes to the Appellate Division, and then the Court of Appeal, which holds -- in an unpublished opinion -- that it's categorically okay for police to follow people into their homes when they're "fleeing', even for minor misdemeanors. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
That whole "looking for kiddie porn" thing is -- to put it mildly -- super fraught with danger, wholly apart from its many other unsavory aspects.Lest anyone believe that these things aren't super easy to discover, Justice Brown's opinion goes into detail about the automated system that apparently thousands of police officers are using every single day to find people sharing kiddie porn:"In August 2014, Vacaville police detective Jeffrey Datzman was… [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
I've said some good things recently about good opinions and good people. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
It's so hard to find like minded people that share the same interests, especially with a daughter who's close in age to mine. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:12 am
" initial people in the opinion. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:30 am
Here's an excerpt from the opening paragraphs:In Schuette v. [read post]
