Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al" Results 781 - 800 of 1,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2021, 8:52 pm by Lydia Estep
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:28 pm by Howard D. Geneslaw
The Township’s Zoning Officer determined that (i) plaintiff’s application was not complete, and (ii) pursuant to the Ordinance Amendment, plaintiff’s project no longer required merely a conditional use variance, but a d(1) use variance, governed by the more stringent standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d)(1). [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:00 pm by Trey Childress
This case as well as the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Sarei v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Rapid Transit Dist. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 1, 6 (Helfend)), ensures that plaintiff here may recover in damages the amounts her insurer paid for her medical care. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm by Kali Borkoski
Foreign Relations Law Amicus brief for Retired Military Officers Amicus brief for Human Rights First et al. [read post]