Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth" Results 781 - 800 of 1,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2011, 4:36 am by rnahoum
The term does not include – (A) any officer or employee of a creditor while, in the name of the creditor, collecting debts for such creditor; (B) any person while acting as a debt collector for another person, both of whom are related by common ownership or affiliated by corporate control, if the person acting as a debt collector does so only for persons to whom it is so related or affiliated and if the principal business of such person is not the collection of debts; (C) any officer or… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) No, said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Wednesday in Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:26 am by Jeff Gamso
Haynesworth’s claims of innocence is so powerful that along with his own lawyers, the prosecutors from both jurisdictions where the rapes occurred support his efforts, as well as the attorney general for the commonwealth, Kenneth T. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 10:52 am by Timothy Cornell
In Bulldog Investors General Partnership v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 10:52 am by Timothy Cornell
In Bulldog Investors General Partnership v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Commonwealth, 702 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010, 106 S.Ct. 3311, 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986).In Sparks v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm by Michael Stevens
Commonwealth, 702 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010, 106 S.Ct. 3311, 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986).In Sparks v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
That sentiment was echoed by the US First Circuit last Friday in Glik v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
For an example of such a law being applied to punish a citizen, see this post, which discusses the 2001 Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:07 pm by James McComish
” Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 9) [2011] FCA 832 at [40] Referring to remarks in Yamouchi v Kishimoto (2002) 12 NTLR 32 and Bell Group Ltd (In Liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation (2004) 208 ALR 491, his Honour considered that to take evidence by video link was, in effect, to exercise the judicial power of the Commonwealth of Australia in the foreign country in which the witness was sitting; and that even if the… [read post]