Search for: "Price v. Price et al"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
Also, in Kiobel, Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represented Achmed et al. and the Center for Justice and Accountability as amici curiae in support of the petitioners. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
Halliburton Co., et al., Dkt. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
” “Discrimination” can be based on legally protected criteria, such as race or gender, or it can be any differential treatment between any customers (such as “price discrimination”). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 7:00 pm
Those issues were explored in the recent decision of Gagnon & Associates Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
State of California, et al. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm
Lee et al v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation, et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:04 pm
doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03467-2 Salmonella and Campylobacter continue to be the leading bacterial foodborne pathogens frequently associated with consumption or handling of raw poultry meat and meat products, a serious food safety concern (Scallan et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2011; Antunes et al., 2016; Skarp et al., 2016). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:32 am
Cl. 489 (1997) and Pyxis Corp., B-282469 et al., July 15, 1999, 99-2 CPD ¶ 18 – the Court and the GAO respectively ruled that included non-Schedule items in a Schedule purchase was a no-no (a time-honored legal phrase). [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 8:01 am
[v][vi] Total market capitalization increased by 3,363% in 2017, with Bitcoin’s market cap jumping 1,364% and the Altcoin side shooting 16,695%. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:29 am
Murphy Contractors v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Inc. et al.; Colorquick, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Phoenix Trading, Inc., et. al. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
Connell, et. al., No. 10 Civ. 3753 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
Connell, et. al., No. 10 Civ. 3753 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
