Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 781 - 800
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
Below is the final version of H.R. 2715 with the snappy title of "To provide the Consumer Product Safety Commission with greater authority and discretion in enforcing the consumer product safety laws, and for other purposes. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
New Department of Justice Policy Means Corporate Officials Could be Targeted When the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
Prior to this change, there was no warning, and a first strike would result in a 90-day freeze on live streaming. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
More than 450 e-commerce websites and retailers have partnered with Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty to employ aggressive sales tactics against their online customers splitting the revenue about 50-50. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury published final regulations (“Regulations”) implementing these new rules on December 6, 2012. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:22 am
In SEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
The 10% increase in the state share of the recovery corresponds to a 10% reduction in the federal share.[4]The Fiscal and Policy Note analysis provided an illustration of how a DRA-compliant act would benefit the state:State Fiscal Effect: To the extent that the bill is approved by the Office of the Inspector General at the federal Department of Health and Human Services, DHMH special fund revenues increase under the bill beginning as early as fiscal 2011 due to increased fraud… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
However, CA RIAs can avoid these additional requirements by engaging a PCAOB-registered auditor to prepare and distribute audited financial statements to all beneficial owners of the pooled investment vehicle, and the Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”). [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
, United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is only in the most serious and clearest of cases that these extensive reviews make feasible sense—as a matter of practicality and as a matter of efficient expenditure of taxpayer revenues. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
It is only in the most serious and clearest of cases that these extensive reviews make feasible sense—as a matter of practicality and as a matter of efficient expenditure of taxpayer revenues. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
While the previous OS iPad version remains available at the Apple App Store exit disclaimer icon (search under “HHS SRA Tool”), HIPAA Entities that presently use or plan to use the OS iPad tool should consider comparing the prior tool against the updated Windows SRA Tool to verify the continued suitability of its continued use and any adjustments in understanding or application that might be warranted by these differences. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Pix Credit: No Attention Paid on Human Rights When Implementing Economic Reforms! [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
With the use of “(cleaned up)” in the recent Brownback v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/03/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/08/07 1ST REPORT CAL.1201/09/07 2ND REPORT CAL.
LAW / CORRECTNSS690
FLANAGAN -- Makes certain technical amendments to provisions of law requiring employers to check the sex offender registry prior to filling certain employment positionsSUMM : Amd SS1392-a, 1394-a & 1394-b, Pub Health L Makes certain technical amendments to provisions of law requiring employers to check the sex offender registry prior to filling… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
