Search for: "R Crawford"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
We believe that, under the facts of this case, memory loss did not render [the witness] “absent” for Confrontation Clause purposes…The Supreme Court has generally rejected the notion that a present and testifying witness is nevertheless absent for confrontation purposes if the witness suffer from memory loss.Curiously, the CCA cites only pre-Crawford cases. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm
Conrad, Indiana University Mauer School of LawSteve Cook, Philosophy, Utica CollegeRobert Crawford,Arts and Sciences, University of WashingtonThomas P. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
Kate will also be leading a session with Dawn Crawford called “Beginner Social Media - Where Do I Start? [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
And reader Hal Crawford writes: “Just so you know, I know I have written to you before suggesting that I thought that Ann Althouse was a bit overexposed on your blog. [read post]
PEOPLE ARE ASKING ME WHERE TO DONATE TO HELP JAPANESE EARTHQUAKE VICTIMS: Clarice Feldman is recomm…
13 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
UPDATE: Reader Robert Crawford emails: “Not sure about AmeriCares, but my wife and I just donated to the Red Cross, which has a specific fund for Japan on its website. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Focus on Crawford-related issues should not obscure the fact that many significant Confrontation Clause questions concern the scope of the accused’s right to cross-examine a witness who actually testifies at trial. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
Deputy Chief Technology Officer), Beth Noveck (New York Law School), and Susan Crawford (Yeshiva University). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:10 am
The executive, Jason Crawford, added that if a customer’s site is found to contain illicit material like child pornography, the FBI is contacted. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:44 am
In 2009, in Crawford v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:21 am
The Court has long been at sea on the meaning of the clause and Crawford and later Davis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:07 am
That 2004 case, Crawford v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
We need the Court to stay on the path it chose with Melendez-Diaz and Crawford. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:29 pm
District Representative Alabama 2 Martha Roby (R) Alabama 5 Mo Brooks (R) Arizona 1 Paul Gosar (R) Arizona 3 Ben Quayle (R) Arizona 5 David Schweikert (R) Arkansas 1 Rick Crawford (R) Arkansas 2 Tim Griffin (R) Arkansas 3 Steve Womack (R) California 19 Jeff Denham (R) Colorado 3 Scott… [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:18 am
Roberts was directly overruled by Crawford v Washington. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
Bryant is like a big, speeding Mack Truck being driven through the tiny gap left open in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:37 pm
The Court labeled the man's statements "non-testimonial" for purposes of the Confrontation Clause (and the Crawford case). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:41 am
After all, honestly overruling Crawford would destroy the illusion of judicial minimalism and restraint. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
Because I continue to adhere to the Confrontation Clause that the People adopted, as described in Crawford v. [read post]
