Search for: "R T Miller"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
Verdugo-Urquidez says that some people have no Fourth Amendment rights, but I don’t see how that creates a “targeting” doctrine. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
If this 62 percent statistic wouldn’t meaningfully identify any individuals, I don’t see how the bar publishing the fact that (and I’m making up numbers here, since we don’t have and may not get any actual data for a while) 230 of UCLA’s 270 first-time takers in July 2016 passed would lead to any significant prospect of individual identification either.Perhaps the bar is acting out of an abundance of caution given § 6060.25, but… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:30 am
Bryan T. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:40 am
BeLabor the Point from the team at Stearns Weaver Miller is an invaluable resource for employers, management, in-house counsel, HR professionals, and anyone interested in the latest in employment law. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
She ain’t getting it. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 5:49 am
”...The Mic aired programming from progressive national commentators including Alan Colmes, Thom Hartmann, Stephanie Miller and Bill Press.... [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm
The Examiner also explained that even if Miller didn't discuss the desirability of particular effusivity values, recognition by the Applicant of a different advantage that flowed naturally from the prior art doesn't confer patentability (citing to Ex parte Obiaya, 227 USPQ 58 (BPAI 1985)).The Applicant once again narrowed the effusivity range (now "from 200-300"), and this time argued there was no suggestion or teaching in the references to both replace… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:00 pm
The newly discovered emails may reinforce the fact that she did not properly secure government-related emails, but is there anyone in the country who doesn’t already know this?) [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 2016 EWHC 2768 (Admin) see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2016/2768.pdf A spokesperson from the Crown – or UK gov’t – or the Tory party, pick your poison, announced, as one might expect, that the decision will be appealed. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
KF8205.E28 2010 Echo-Hawk, Walter R. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:18 pm
If you have an Apple TV and you have kids, then I suspect that you will be a hero when you tell them that, as reported by Chance Miller of 9to5Mac (and announced at yesterday's event), Minecraft is coming to Apple TV later this year. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:08 am
July 7, 2010) (cites omitted): According to Barefoot, Landis and Miller also had him placed in lockdown for “security concerns” when two witnesses, “Habitual Li[a]r[s],” were in the compound yard together and when Barefoot “utilized on Envelopes Poor Man’s Copyright to copyright multiple gospel, country, and Blue Grass songs. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Is Arbitration Okay Under the Miller Act? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Seems the "honorable" Douglas Miller didn't want to be subpoenaed because of the "heightened standard that high level officials are not subject to legal process. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Turner, supra.The Court of Appeals then explained that the `[t]he incriminating nature of an item is immediately apparent if the officers have probable cause to believe that the item is either evidence of a crime or contraband. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Miller treatise on federal practice and procedure. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:42 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In TC Heartland, the accused infringer has asked the Supreme Court to reset the law of venue and give effect to the statutory statement that infringement actions be brought either (1) “in the judicial district where the defendant resides” or (2)” where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
