Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration" Results 781 - 800 of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
So long as the bank account is in their name and uses one of their social security numbers, it won’t create a problem with my government benefits. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  These intellectuals treat marriage equality for LGBTQ+ persons as an admirable social movement and Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
Nevertheless, same-sex couples in New York who marry will not be married under federal law -- a confusing situation when it comes to immigration, taxes, and federal benefits such as Social Security. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The money raised by the payroll tax is used by the government to finance Social Security and Medicare benefits). [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
In 2000, she published Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, and in 2010, she took the stand in Perry v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
In 2000, she published Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation, and in 2010, she took the stand in Perry v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Statements of President Obama  made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
  The global press has, of course, been following the battles between the Biden Administration and Congress over the extent to which the Federal Government may permit pension plan fiduciaries to consider ESG in their investment decisions. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
Carhart, effectively reversing a prior decision (Stenberg v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thereafter, discovery focused on the immigration status of Plaintiffs' employees, including, among other things, Plaintiffs' I-9 documentation and records in the possession of the Social Security Administration. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
Problem            In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to address the “alarmingly high percentage of Indian families […] broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and institutions,” as well as the fact “that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through administrative… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:53 am by admin
District Court for the Northern District of California (United States v. [read post]