Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R" Results 781 - 800 of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
But it still provides useful instruction, and I therefore commend it to your reading list: 130 S.Ct. 1367 (2010) UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC., Petitioner, v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rick Scott, R-Fla., told his X followers why he thought former President Donald Trump should be reelected. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38 [2006]; see EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19 [2005]). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:23 am by gmlevine
” This construction of paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy has not been challenged in later cases. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
The CJEU has said that the extensive use which is made of a mark is relevant to the assessment of confusion in Specsavers v Asda (C-252/12), but I think the judge has stretched that principle too far.Lots of options to read more about this case here.3. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the legal malpractice action may not be maintained as to those counts (see Sgambelluri, 78 AD3d at 925 [“A plea of guilty bars recovery for legal malpractice, ‘[r]egardless of the plaintiffs subjective reasons for pleading guilty”‘], quoting Casement v O’Neill, 28 AD3d 508, 509 [2d Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
I’m not going to take you through the reasoning, since it involves very close reading of the (very poorly drafted and confusing) statutory provisions. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:39 am by Eric Goldman
All of the principal reading materials remain, and I didn’t add any new principal reading materials. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
A writes to B about his neighbor C: “I think he must be an alcoholic. [read post]