Search for: "Rules for Court Reporters" Results 781 - 800 of 91,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2016, 11:03 am by Emelina Perez
A court in Kiel, Germany, ruled Friday that a 92-year-old woman charged with Nazi crimes is unfit to stand trial. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:48 am
James Vicini of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court rules against city in race-based promotions case. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 10:12 am by Matthew Santiago
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Wednesday issued an order [order, PDF] enjoining Hawaii from counting recent election ballots pending a final ruling from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website]. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:14 am by Renee Phillips
”  The Court further discussed how its ruling aligned with Dodd-Frank’s “core objective” of motivating people to report securities laws violations to the SEC. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Jeff Welty
It’s not completely clear whether the 911 caller gave her name, so the trial court treated the report as an anonymous tip, but ruled that it was reliable enough to provide reasonable suspicion. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:22 am
"EPA prohibited from regulating lead bullets, court rules": The Hill has this report on a ruling that the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
" Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that "Illegal immigrants have no automatic right to freedom, Supreme Court rules. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:13 am by Immigration Prof
Amy Howe reports for SCOTUSBlog on the latest developments in the Supreme Court in a last ditch effort to derail the Trump administration's public charge rule: "In January, the Supreme Court – by a vote of 5-4 – granted a... [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Bob Kraft
The ABA Journal reported that the Supreme Court "has ruled that consumers who received the Aspire Visa credit card are bound by a mandatory arbitration provision in their applications. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:53 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the deduction was not available to Ransom and other debtors without a car payment. [read post]
1 Aug 2006, 6:30 am
UK Home Secretary John Reid [official profile] had appealed a High Court ruling [JURIST reports], arguing that it had contained "misunderstandings and errors. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 3:07 pm by Gene Takagi
” The post Court Strikes Down Rule Excepting Certain Nonprofits from Donor Disclosures appeared first on Nonprofit Law Blog. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post Divided Court Stays OSHA Vaccine or Test Mandate While Allowing CMS Vaccination Rule to Proceed appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:25 am by Erika Frank
Last week, the Second District California Court of Appeal ruled that on-call employees are entitled to reporting time pay if they are required to contact the employer to see whether they must actually report to work (Ward v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:08 pm
The request was brought by the Pacific Justice Institute [advocacy website] in an attempt to force a state government appeal [San Francisco Chronicle report] of last month's federal court ruling [JURIST report] that found... [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
Spero News reports on a petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus filed with the Ohio Supreme Court of Sept. 12 by Marie Macfarlane, a family law activist who has conducted a campaign against no-fault divorce. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:41 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post Supreme Court Rules Census Suit Not Ripe for Judicial Review appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm by Robert Kreisman
Ultimately, the court rejected the plaintiff’s counsel’s assertion of work-product protection under Rule 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) and ordered the production of all drafts of the expert’s report and a number of communications from the plaintiff’s counsel. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm by emagraken
  Rule 11-3 assumes that either the parties have agreed to the concept of a joint expert, or that the court has already ordered one in a CPC. [read post]