Search for: "S. Holmes" Results 781 - 800 of 5,230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Her withdrawal marks the first high-profile defeat of one of Biden’s nominees. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:54 am
Whether you agree with the results or not, the opinions of Holmes, Cardozo and Traynor, to name a few, are mostly short and concise. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm by Johanna Alonso
In his work, Will Holmes consults for major business and government offices in the Baltimore area. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:35 pm by Tom Smith
” If the Democrats stole the last election, they stole it mostly legally in Holmess sense because they got away with it and the powers that be were unwilling to intervene. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:41 pm by Chris Attig
Court of Appeals Veterans Claims issued a precedential opinion in Holmes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 1:41 pm
For many who hold freedom of speech as a sacred right, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmess 1919 dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:08 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1919), a majority of the Court upheld the act, but Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissented, with Justice Louis Brandeis agreeing with Holmes. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:00 am by Jody Simon
Despite quotes in the defendants’ motion from the Seventh Circuit decision referring to the plaintiff’s business practices as “a form of extortion,” it appears that neither side was willing to put the Doyle Estate’s theory to the test. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Despite the fact that the character of Sherlock Holmes is more than a century old, and most of the stories featuring him are in the public domain, a few of Doyle’s later mysteries are not yet in the public domain. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The metaphor was first introduced in the early 20th century by supreme court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Abrams v US, in which he opined that “the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market”. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:13 pm by Jacob Schulz
” But the founders seem to be reading Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (or at least some pre-2016 blogs) and try to plant Substack’s flag firmly in the sand: “We prefer a contest of ideas. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am by ernst
  After quoting Holmess opinion in Miller, Peckham concluded it did not, but only because “the ex parte finding of the health officers as to the fact [of the poultry’s unwholesomeness] is not in any way binding” in a subsequent judicial proceeding. [read post]