Search for: "STATE v DIAZ"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Washington, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:16 pm
A case recently decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
United States (08-5721). [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
(2) How does the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:45 am
, United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-9660, Diaz-Esparza v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (Fox) Brief in opposition (NBC) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 07-591 Case name: Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
In another 5-4 decision, though borne of strange bedfellows, the Supreme Court has reversed in Bullcoming v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on circuits courts' power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte)No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:28 am
Diaz-DiazU.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
AND LAURIE DIAZ, Respondents. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, October 17, 2008 Diaz v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
” In Diaz v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:35 pm
Hayes (07-608) — ban on gun possession after conviction for domestic violence Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:45 am
Apple, a judge in the SDNY, in the case of Diaz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 12:49 pm
See Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm
Since Crawford was decided, courts have struggled to come up with a comprehensive definition of the term "testimonial," but one factor that must be considered is the degree to which a statement is deemed accusatory, i.e., whether it seeks to establish facts essential to the elements of the crimes as ruled in People v Encarnacion, Melendez- Diaz v Massachusetts and People v Rawlins. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:22 am
A motion on similar facts was denied last week in the case of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company v. [read post]
