Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD" Results 781 - 800 of 855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
S 58 BLURB : Budgbi HMH Art. vii Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160 Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
(5) A discussion of specific policy recommendations to deter the activities of notorious foreign infringers and encourage foreign businesses industry norms that promote the protection of intellectual property globally, including addressing— (A) whether notorious foreign infringers that engage in significant infringing should be prohibited by the laws of the States from seeking to raise capital United States, including offering stock to the public; and (B) whether the… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
In 1993, the Swaps Monitor, an industry newsletter, reported that the derivatives market amounted to a total of US$24 trillion, representing approximately four times the size of America’s domestic product by that time. [3] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the… [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am by SHG
From the perspective of a police officer, as the law requires the shooting be considered under Graham v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am by Dennis Crouch
  Some however, were blocked or cancelled (including the Washington Redskins mark) on that basis before the Supreme Court held the bar unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]