Search for: "Screws v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 1,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
The brief argues that a court may legitimately tell builders that their walls and buildings will still stand if they use a blue screw instead of a red screw, but the courts cannot tell a designer that an outfit works equally well with blue shoes, as it does with red shoes. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  The court backpedaled from that a bit last year in Holland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 6:33 am by Christopher Simon
Related Posts: Atlanta Federal Court Denies Plaintiff’s Clever Attempt to Have Case Returned to State Court Georgia Court of Appeals Discusses Ante Litem Notice Compliance in Recent Ruling Watson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:43 pm
Will the citizen (and resident alien, really) v noncitizen distinction continue to apply; and will the territorial v nonterritorial distinction continue to apply in counterterroism legal regimes? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:00 am by Rumpole
The DHSMV is ignoring their own rules and screwing the criminal defense bar and the drivers of the state of Florida. [read post]